We all know how the cost of living is skyrocketing around the world. Particularly in some towns and cities of the United States, the rich are displacing the poor, allowing gentrification to take over in such areas.
In order to survive, the poor and all those who want to live a moderate life in these areas and elsewhere in the country, have resorted to cutting down their expenditure on housing.
People are increasingly turning to tiny homes, which of course save money as compared to traditional homes.
These dwellings, typically defined as less than 500 square feet, are a way for people to break free of mortgages, taxes, utility bills and the general trappings of “stuff.”
They’re especially attractive to millennials and retirees, or those seeking to live off-grid.
A big priority for tiny home dwellers is their reduced environmental impact.
Many are capable of producing all their own energy from solar and wind, collecting rainwater and reusing gray-water. This reduces the cost of living for people who live in these tiny homes.
However, in some towns and cities, officials are not happy with people who are cutting down on their living expenses.
People living in tiny homes are being constantly harassed by these unscrupulous officials. Increasingly, many towns and cities officials are either banning tiny homes or forcing owners to connect their little homes to the utility grid.
In the city of Etowah in Tennessee, city commissioners have amended an ordinance to prevent the construction of tiny homes. In fact, officials voted to set a minimum area for houses of 800 square feet in Residential 1 zones, and 600 square feet in Residential 2 and 3 zones.
This means that residents would no longer be able to construct their tiny homes, which are typically less than 500 square feet.
In Alaska’s city of Wasilla, a similar thing has happened. The tiny house movement has starting to emerge in the state. However, city officials are now passing laws to ban further construction of these cost-effective houses.
In the city of Boise in Idaho, officials do not allow homes of less than a few hundred square feet. Officials fallaciously claimed allowing tiny homes will lead to decay and unsightly little cabins plunked down beside traditional homes.
Los Angeles’ city officials have openly called tiny homes for the homeless “a threat in many ways to our public safety.” This has rendered many poor people in the city homeless.
23-year-old college graduate, Sarah Hastings, built a 190-square-foot home on three acres of farmland in the city of Hadley, Massachusetts. She even set a small garden next to it.
The tiny house looked very beautiful. But town officials claimed she was not in compliance with zoning ordinances, and therefore forced her to abandon her beautiful and cost-effective home.
Hastings proposed a change to the town’s laws to allow for her tiny home, but the measure was voted down by town officials.
In fact, as of now, few towns and cities in the United States allow for the stand-alone tiny houses. Most communities have minimum square footage requirements for single-family homes, mandating that smaller dwellings be an “accessory” to a larger, traditional house.
Many also have rules requiring that dwellings be hooked up to utilities, which is a problem for tiny-house enthusiasts who want to live off the grid by using alternative energy sources, such as solar panels and rainwater catchment systems.
“When cities require the same permitting for tiny houses on foundations as they do for traditional houses, it often doesn’t make financial sense to build tiny.
“At that point it’s really more of a lifestyle choice than an economic choice,” said Nick Krautter, a real estate agent in Portland, Oregon who abandoned plans for a tiny house development.