Trump to Eliminate NASA Climate Research

President-elect plans to entirely slash climate science in favor of deep space exploration

Eliminate NASA Climate ResearchHere comes another blow to the U.S nation. Apparently, president Trump spoke his mind and now NASA has to eliminate its research over climate.

Why the sudden change of heart? It seems climate science is facing some pretty desperate times.

President Trump even began to favor deep space exploration. But is he aware of the dangers that could possibly come from shutting out NASA’s research over our climate?

Research Lead by NASA Stopped Abruptly

Sources have it, Trump plans to eliminate the entire database over climate lead by NASA.

This may appear a rather bold decision taking into consideration how scientists warned us of the consequences.

London School of Economics and Political Science, Bob Ward stated:

“[the proposal was] a shockingly stupid move that would deal a very severe blow to global research on environmental change across the world.”

But the plan to cut the climate research funds did not begin just now. In fact, starting with 2015, the Republican part of the Congress was trying to reduce the funds for climate research. Instead, they wanted, even back then, to replace it with deep space exploration.

But Trump changed sides again, during an interview with the New York Times, denying his previous anti-climate statements. Should we think of those as mere lies?

The Guardian went as far as reporting the story from Bob Walker’s perspective, one of Trump’s campaign adviser. This is what he said during an interview:

“We see NASA in an exploration role, in deep space research.

Earth-centric science is better placed at other agencies where it is their prime mission.

My guess is that it would be difficult to stop all ongoing NASA programs but future programs should definitely be placed with other agencies. I believe that climate research is necessary but it has been heavily politicized, which has undermined a lot of the work that researchers have been doing. Mr. Trump’s decisions will be based upon solid science, not politicized science.”

Further Views on Climate Change

It can actually happen. Senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research Kevin Trenberth also revealed to the Guardian that by going through with this plan, it

“could put us back into the ‘dark ages’ of almost the pre-satellite era. It would be extremely short sighted.”

Even scientist Michael Mann from Penn State University added his views on the topic:

“Without the support of NASA, not only the U.S. but the entire world would be taking a hard hit when it comes to understanding the behavior of our climate and the threats posed by human-caused climate change.”

The Scientific American reached a conclusion. If Under Obama’s presidency the program evolved, under Trump’s ruling it might fade away.

“Now set to hold majorities in both the House and Senate, Republicans appear likely to support forthcoming Trump administration proposals to pare back NASA’s Earth science budget, which grew by some 50 percent under the Obama administration. That boost, which gave Earth science the lion’s share of NASA’s science funding, has sustained a growing fleet of satellites that collect data demonstrating climate change’s reality: rising surface temperatures and greenhouse gas emissions, retreating glaciers and ice sheets, and shifting patterns of rainfall and vegetation growth, to name a few.

Earth science’s preferred growth under Obama—the fact that it has grown over all of NASA’s other science—has created a big political target on its back and validated, in a sense, Republican interpretations of its partisan nature,” says Casey Dreier, director of space policy for The Planetary Society. “And this is taking place in a new political dynamic of strong, near-universal condemnation and skepticism of climate change by the Republican Party, without a Democratic president and key members of Congress that used to push back. That’s a bad double whammy for Earth science.”

Trump Administration Gone Wrong?

Right now, scientists fear for the changes that the program will have to go through. Mostly, they believe that the cuts implemented by Trump will not offer the results expected by the president.

The threat to NASA is real. And we may as well start believing that a disaster in global warming is heading our way.

Director of the Climate & Energy College at the Melbourne University, Malte Meinshausen feels disappointing regarding the outcome:

“While deep space exploration enables us to have big dreams, understanding planet earth enables us to live better lives and actually save lives.”

The NASA Aqua satellite comes into discussion as well. Malte continued to note how it

“now delivers unprecedented detail about the water cycle, and the patterns of carbon- dioxide concentrations.

Those satellites are what the X-ray instrument is in any hospital—vital to our understanding where the patient planet Earth is sick and what the root causes are.”

The Sydney Morning Herald also holds a statement by Bob Ward, policy and communications director at the Grantham Research Institute in London. He declared that:

“[cutting research funds] would be a shockingly stupid move that would deal a very severe blow to global research on environmental change across the world”.

“Stopping all funding would, for instance, mean abandoning satellites that monitor the Earth’s surface, and would be an enormous waste of billions of dollars of scientific research.”

Does Trump know something that the public doesn’t? Is climate change an issue?

But There is Hope

But climate scientist Gavin Schmidt gives us a glance of hope. In his opinion, the federal bureaucracy might save NASA’s funds.

He believes that thanks to the size and complexity of the bureaucracy, it might not be possible to cut funds that drastically.

He released an interview for Business Insider, stating:

“When I first started working for the federal government I got frustrated, like why are we stuck in this pattern? Why are decisions that are made so difficult to reverse? Why is it so hard to shift anything? And it’s hard because there’s a lot of people and there’s a lot of moving parts and there’s a huge amount of money. But now I’m thinking, ‘Oh, you know what, it’s a good thing that that things can’t be changed on a dime.’

Chopping off science just to prevent people from talking about climate change won’t work, you need science for hazards, for weather forecasting, and climate comes along for the ride.

During the [George W.] Bush administration we had climate skeptics rewriting reports and trying to control what’s said to the media. But the planet kept warming. We kept reporting on it. We kept improving the science that underlies our understanding of why it’s changing. And we will work to continue to do so.”

In the end, nobody knows what president Trump is in fact thinking. Will he keep his promise to end the research established by NASA? Will our world start to face any consequences?

Maybe it’s just a matter of time, but sooner or later citizens will find out Trump’s real intentions.

Find us here

Get news from the CSGLOBE in your inbox each weekday morning

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors/source and do not necessarily reflect the position of CSGLOBE or its staff.

Paid content

Top Tech Expert: The Next Trillion-Dollar Industry Will Be Built on Genetic Code

Alec Ross served as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's senior advisor for innovation. During that role, he earned unique insight into the changing...

Scientists Turn Algae into Usable Fuel

Alternative fuel: Algae could replace petroleum fuels. Scientists Turn Algae into Usable Fuel in Less than an Hour Algae has already been touted as a natural...

The bike [velomobile] that could let you pedal as fast as a CAR

Human-powered velomobiles are meant to be a quirky alternative to cars. But because these pedal-powered machines can't go as fast, these vehicles have up until...

What's New Today

Georgia House Votes To Allow Citizens To Abolish Police Departments In The State

The Georgia House backed an effort on Friday to dissolve the Glynn County Police Department and any...

Leaked CDC document contradicts Pence claim that U.S. coronavirus cases ‘have stabilized’

Even as Vice President Mike Pence wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Tuesday that coronavirus...

Five bombshells about Trump from Bolton ‘s book

Excerpts from former national security adviser John Bolton ’s book about his time in the Trump administration...

Don’t Listen to Fox. Here’s What’s Really Going On in Seattle’s Protest Zone.

It seems I live in a city undergoing a “totalitarian takeover” that will lead to “fascist outcomes”...

MOST READ

What Is Agenda 21? Depopulation of 95% of the World By 2030

Most people are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nations program which plans to depopulate 95%...

Oklahoma High Schooler’s Carbon Discovery Elicits Wonder From Experts

Taking teenage rebellion to a new level, Oklahoma high school senior George Wang stunned teachers and fellow students when in April he co-authored a...

Bombs Have Been Dropped in Nevada – U.S. is Responsible

Apparently, America is now using Nevada's land to test bombs. With each passing day, the U.S. continues to follow their own personal agenda. A report did reveal...

Top Tech Expert: The Next Trillion-Dollar Industry Will Be Built on Genetic Code

Alec Ross served as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's senior advisor for innovation. During that role, he earned unique insight into the changing...

Living materials created by MIT, mimicking natural systems

Living materials created by MIT scientists can sense and respond to surrounding Living materials, created by MIT researchers are able to sense stimuli and react...

Quantum experiment verifies Einstein’s ‘spooky action at a distance’

An experiment devised in Griffith University's Centre for Quantum Dynamics has for the first time demonstrated Albert Einstein's original conception of "spooky action at...

If You’re Alive in 30 Years, it’s Likely You Will be Alive in 1000 Years

Life extension is no joke. It's being pursued, avidly, by the chief engineer at Google, Ray Kurzweil, and is increasingly popular, with some scientists...

Thousands Of Buffalo Appear At Site Of Standing Rock Protest

Last week, tensions between law enforcement workers and peaceful protesters with the Standing Rock Sioux tribe escalated. A series of standoffs resulted in “protectors” being...

Scientists Receive Approval to Genetically Engineer Human Embryos

While many people are focused on the effects of genetically engineered food, concerns over genetically modified human embryos are also growing — and some...

Here’s how Stephen Hawking predicted the world will end

When he wasn’t solving the mysteries of black holes and revolutionizing theoretical physics, Stephen Hawking spoke (a lot) about how the world would end. From...

Proof of Aliens in Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs, Relics Hidden in Rockefeller Museum

While the US government and its military industrial cutouts continue to drip-drip-drip the faucet of partial disclosure, we have evidence dating back to ancient...