It’s Official: This Is Straight Out Of Orwell’s 1984

Must read

What Is Agenda 21? Depopulation of 95% of the World By 2030

Most people are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nations program which plans to depopulate 95%...

14 African Countries Who Still Pay Colonial Tax To France

80% of the 10 countries with the lowest literacy rates in the WORLD among adults are in francophone Africa. Namely: Benin (40%), Burkina Faso (26%),...

Is USA lying to WHO on virus data? Or WHO is lying the world?

Numbers have a certain mystique: They seem precise, exact, sometimes even beyond doubt. But outside the field...

Bill Gates: If I were president, this is what I would do now to fight coronavirus

If Bill Gates were President of the United States right now, he would prioritize keeping people across...

This Is Straight Out Of Orwell’s 1984

Remember 1984? In Orwell’s dystopic vision of the future, there was a huge difference between “truth” — what actually is — and “facts” — what a consensus has been led to believe.

Now the search engine giant Google will be delisting and censoring content that doesn’t follow “well-established” scientific, medical, or historical “facts”. Check out the company’s newly updated quality raters guidelines.

- Advertisement -

While you may think of all the links returned to you in a Google search as “information choices,” Google’s Eric Schmidt (annual Bilderberg attendee) thinks of them as “bugs” that need to be eradicated from their system, and that users should be given one “right” answer. In that case, these new guidelines are the extermination squad.

On one page, it refers to “Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (EAT)” regarding on what constitutes “expertise” on a topic in the eyes of Google, then proceeds to link to the BBC and USA Today as “high quality news sources”.

It also notes, “High quality information pages on scientific topics should represent well-established scientific consensus on issues where such consensus exists.” Medical information will be ranked and listed the same way. Take a guess what the prescribed “consensus” is there…

The guide also specifically mentions giving the lowest rankings to what they deem “conspiracy theories”.

Welcome to 1984. Is anyone going to say anything?

And if they do, will anyone hear us?

(Some in the comments have suggested DuckDuckGo which claims not to track and Startpage. At least there are alternatives out there, but more people need to start using them en masse to really effect change.)


Disclaimer | Any views or opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author/source presented below, and do not necessarily reflect the position of CSGlobe or its staff.

More articles

Latest article

Bill Gates: If I were president, this is what I would do now to fight coronavirus

If Bill Gates were President of the United States right now, he would prioritize keeping people across...

The Total Number of Coronavirus Cases Could be 10 Times Higher Than Official Numbers !?

Piero Cruciatti | AFP | Getty Images The head of Italy’s civil protection authority says he feared the...

Prince Charles tests positive for coronavirus

Prince Charles speaking at a dinner at Mansion House in London in aid of the Australian bushfire relief and recovery effort...

Coronavirus: Pandemic is ‘accelerating’, WHO warns as cases pass 385,000

FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP The coronavirus pandemic that’s spread to nearly every country in the world is picking...

Is USA lying to WHO on virus data? Or WHO is lying the world?

Numbers have a certain mystique: They seem precise, exact, sometimes even beyond doubt. But outside the field...