Confronting climate change

Big role U.S. can play in confronting climate change

Confronting climate change may not be popular but it’s the right thing to do.

The new rules proposed by EPA aren’t ideal. But it’s a start and could give the United States a position of strength from which to influence other nations.

On climate change the planet is saying, you can pay me now or you can pay me later.

President Obama has made a modest step on paying now with the Environmental Protection Agency proposing rules that would require coal-fired power plants to reduce their carbon emissions by about a third between now and 2030.

Coal is the largest cause of carbon-dioxide emissions, followed by automobiles.

If the new regulations survive the three-month comment period, as well as challenges from Congress and in court, they would give states great flexibility in meeting the targets. Washington state is already in good shape.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has warned that the regulations would cost $50 billion a year. As Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman has pointed out, that’s not an insurmountable sum in a $15 trillion economy. And that accepts that the questionable methodology of the Chamber is true.

The EPA estimates economic benefits between $55 billion and $93 billion by 2030. Among the other goods would be avoiding thousands of premature deaths as well as lowering asthma attacks among children.

Hyped job losses among coal miners, hardly an ideal vocation, are not weighed against the job gains in such areas as solar and other alternative energy, as well as building new plants to run on natural gas and developing effective carbon-capture technology for coal.

The economy is dynamic and responds to incentives.

The new rules aren’t ideal. But Congress refuses to act on more aggressive steps, such as taxing carbon or cap-and-trade. It’s a start and could give the United States a position of strength from which to influence other nations.

The pay-me later scenario is on display with the latest report from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

I’m not a scientist, as Florida Sen. Marco Rubio would say. But the most eminent scientists who actually study climate have concluded that the problem is already being felt on every continent and in the oceans. And it will get much worse unless action is taken.

Intensifying drought is putting pressure on food and water supplies, as well as increasing wildfires. Ocean acidification, a consequence of climate change explored in depth by The Seattle Times’ Craig Welch and Steve Ringman, poses a critical danger to fisheries. Sea rise will endanger cities and settlements worldwide.

And yet it is difficult to pin down a sum from this disaster that might get the attention of our society, which puts so much stock by money. Even if economists agreed, critics would immediately throw out arguments that the costs of action are too great.

For example, the 2006 Stern Review, prepared for the British government, said measures to lower carbon emissions would be much cheaper than doing nothing. It is still being argued over.

The review stated that without action, climate change would cost world gross domestic product 5 percent a year, a figure that could rise to 20 percent if wider effects are factored in. Since then, economist Nicholas Stern has said he underestimated the costs because climate change is happening faster than was assumed.

Another report, from the International Energy Agency, said that “decarbonizing” the world energy system would require $44 trillion in investment. But it would be offset by more than $115 trillion in fuel savings.

What is clear is that the status quo represents a massive market failure whose costs will far offset the any seeming benefits such as a year-round Northwest Passage and new oil reserves (to further worsen climate change).

Industrial civilization has been pumping greenhouse gases into the global commons called the atmosphere. Yet the costs of doing so haven’t been priced in.

Inaction means leaving our children and grandchildren a nasty and dangerous Earth that we wouldn’t recognize. And no, adapting will not be enough.

Making the many transitions to avoid that fate will take years and great political will. So far, it hasn’t been happening, even though the first U.N. conference on climate change was held in 1992.

The bitter resistance to America acting is especially peculiar.

For one thing, the United States is the world’s second-largest emitter of CO2, and the largest per capita, almost 18 tons per person annually. That’s well above most of Europe and the advanced economies of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). So even acting alone, we would make a huge difference.

Also, opponents to addressing climate change tend to be people who celebrate American ingenuity and American exceptionalism. Why do those virtues not give us both an advantage and a duty in saving the planet on which you, me and the Koch brothers all live?

America would be followed, particularly if we led in research and manufacturing of clean energy technologies.

The 70th anniversary of D-Day was marked last week, when we helped liberate a continent and destroy a regime that represented an unprecedented threat to the world. We did that.

Next month will mark the 1969 flight of Apollo 11, which landed humans from Earth on another heavenly body for the first time, part of a burst of scientific achievement. The nation embarked on these endeavors, in the words of President John F. Kennedy, “not because they are easy, but because they are hard.” We did that.

Now our world faces a gathering calamity unlike any in history. Why can’t we lead now? Have we lost our way so?

Unless we find it, we most definitely will pay later.

Source | Seattletimes

Find us here

Get news from the CSGLOBE in your inbox each weekday morning

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors/source and do not necessarily reflect the position of CSGLOBE or its staff.

Paid content

Two Juvenile Mountain Gorillas Dismantle Hunters’ Trap

In Rwanda’s Volcanoes National Park, researchers have observed gorillas seeking out and dismantling poacher after an infant in their band was killed by one...

Elon Musk is launching a tunnel digging company to make underground roads in busy cities

As Elon Musk sat in Los Angeles traffic, an idea came to him. What if he build giant machines to drill underground and create...

Dolphins ‘suffering deformities after BP oil spill’

Dolphins 'suffering miscarriage, lung disease, losing teeth after BP oil spill' researchers claim Bottlenose dolphins with deformities including missing teeth and lung disease have been...

What's New Today

Georgia House Votes To Allow Citizens To Abolish Police Departments In The State

The Georgia House backed an effort on Friday to dissolve the Glynn County Police Department and any...

Leaked CDC document contradicts Pence claim that U.S. coronavirus cases ‘have stabilized’

Even as Vice President Mike Pence wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Tuesday that coronavirus...

Five bombshells about Trump from Bolton ‘s book

Excerpts from former national security adviser John Bolton ’s book about his time in the Trump administration...

Don’t Listen to Fox. Here’s What’s Really Going On in Seattle’s Protest Zone.

It seems I live in a city undergoing a “totalitarian takeover” that will lead to “fascist outcomes”...


What Is Agenda 21? Depopulation of 95% of the World By 2030

Most people are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nations program which plans to depopulate 95%...

Russia & China Declare All Out War on US Petrodollar — Prepare for Exclusive Trade in Gold

The formation of a BRICS gold marketplace, which could bypass the U.S. Petrodollar in bilateral trade, continues to take shape as Russia’s largest bank,...

Vancouver park board votes to ban whales and dolphins at aquarium

Unanimous decision united politicians across party lines voting for 'public will' Victory! On March 9, 2017, the Vancouver park board voted that dolphins, beluga whales, and...

Two Juvenile Mountain Gorillas Dismantle Hunters’ Trap

In Rwanda’s Volcanoes National Park, researchers have observed gorillas seeking out and dismantling poacher after an infant in their band was killed by one...

Shell Oil Spill Dumps Thousands Of Barrels Of Crude Into Gulf Of Mexico

A 2,100-barrel oil spill in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico forced Royal Dutch Shell on Thursday to shut in all wells that flow to...

These Plastic-Eating Worms Could Help Save The World

The wax worm, a caterpillar typically used for fishing bait and known for damaging beehives by eating their wax comb, has now been observed...

Study: Plastic debris widespread on ocean surface

88% of world’s oceans covered by plastic junk At least 88 percent of the surface of the world’s open oceans is polluted by plastic debris,...

US State Department Offers $3 Million Bounty on ISIS Leader THEY Trained

The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, also known as ISIS, has been known to use weapons and vehicles their militants have seized from...

Scientists Develop ‘Nanopores’ That Inexpensively Filter the Salt Out of Seawater

There’s filtration and then there’s filtration. Engineers in the US have been working on the latter, coming up with a new markedly more energy-efficient...

Tesla’s Missing Papers and the Technological Race of the Cold War

One of the more controversial topics involving Nikola Tesla is what became of many of his technical and scientific papers after he died in...

Aspartame: The Bitter Truth Behind This Toxic Sweetener

Where to begin when it comes to Aspartame!? The artificial sweetener has been banned twice by the FDA, and there are numerous studies clearly outlining...