Home | Nature | Environment | Bill Gates Admits to Chemtrails

Bill Gates Admits to Chemtrails

Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering ( Chemtrails )

Geo-engineers are finally coming out of the “chemtrail” closet, as reports are now emerging about deliberate plans in the works to dump untold tons of sulfate chemicals into the atmosphere for the purported purpose of fighting so-called “global warming.”

The U.K.’s Guardian and others are reporting that a multi-million dollar research fund, which just so happens to have been started and funded by Microsoft founder and vaccine enthusiast Bill Gates, is being used to fund the project. A large balloon hovering at 80,000 feet over Fort Sumner, New Mexico, will release the sulfates into the atmosphere within the next year.

The stated purpose for this massive release of toxic sulfate particles is that doing so will allegedly reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere, and thus cool the planet. But many environmental groups and advocates of common sense are decrying the idea as dangerous, and one that could result in permanent damage to ecosystems all across the globe.

“Impacts include the potential for further damage to the ozone layer, and disruption of rainfall, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, potentially threatening the food supplies of billions of people,” said Pat Mooney, Executive Director of the ETC Group, a Canadian environmental protection group.

“It will do nothing to decrease levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or halt ocean acidification. And solar geo-engineering is likely to increase the risk of climate-related international conflict, given that the modeling to date shows it poses greater risks to the global south.”

But the Gates-backed cohort is persistent in its efforts to geo-graffiti the world, as its scientists insist that governments are not doing enough to fight back against the supposed environment impacts of global warming. If governments refuse to implement high enough carbon taxes to eliminate greenhouse gases, in other words, then Gates and Co. believes it has no choice but to “save the planet” by polluting it with sulfate particles.

Spraying the skies with sulfate particles will destroy the planet faster than ‘global warming’ ever could

chemtrails bill gatesSulfate particles are toxic, though, and constitute the very same type of ambient particulate matter (PM) that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers to be a noxious air pollutant. Deliberately spraying the skies with tiny particles composed of any material, for that matter, is hazardous both to respiratory health in humans and animals, as well as to water sources, soils, and other delicate environmental resources.

“Sulfate particles from acid rain can cause harm to the health of marine life in the rivers and lakes it contaminates, and can result in mortality,” says an online water pollution guide (http://www.water-pollution.org.uk/health.html). A University of Washington (UW) report also explains that sulfate particles “contribute to acid rain, cause lung irritation, and have been a main culprit in causing the haze that obscures a clear view of the Grand Canyon.”

Blocking the sun with reflective particles will also deprive humans of natural sunlight exposure, which is a primary source for naturally generating health-promoting vitamin D in the body. So once again, Bill Gates is at the helms of a project that seeks to control the climate in artificial ways using toxic chemicals, an endeavor that is sure to create all sorts of potentially irreversible problems for humanity and the planet.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of Csglobe or its staff.

Source | TheGuardian | InfoWars

46 comments

  1. Sorry folks this is already underway and has been for quite some time.

  2. Can they legally do that without the Governments permission? I would be documenting my health on a daily basis in preparation for that lawsuit against Gates. My grandkids might enjoy living in his house someday while he switches to a low income apartment rental.

  3. Norman Countryman

    There will always be debate over any change. I can remember the debate in the early days of nuclear power about the potential of a nuclear disaster caused by earthquake. We let that debate justify inaction and complacency (it just can’t happen) and now each one of us has to deal with the reality that Fukushima has happened and it may already be too late for our oceans as a result. The fact of the matter is that the earth is a finite system that cannot support infinite population growth. Just like the inevitability of human death (a part of life) so will our society reach the tipping point for our environment, The worst thing that we can do at this point is NOTHING!!! If the focus of our society was shifted just a bit away from war, toward survival of the species. If the billions of dollars that were being spent on a game that has a winner and a looser (war) on a finite planet, what is the inevitable outcome? The first step is for each of us as individuals to embrace the fact that society is ME not THEM. Nature will ultimately balance itself I would really like humanity to be part of that new balance.

  4. Project Oxygen
    Marco Cota
    Executive Director at Beautiful Home
    Agricultural Chemical Engineer

    31 January 2014

    This Bill Gates program is like giving Norco pills to a person with a broken back. We have a real idea please read.

    Project Oxygen is a scientific and historically proven method to reverse global warming and climate change. This project attacks the problem directly. This approach does not require the population to reduce green house gases. It has been debated the solution is to reduce green house gases, this is clearly unobtainable by solid evidence of many emerging nations and the established that refuse to comply. Project Oxygen can and will convert carbon dioxide from its current level of 397 ppm to 240 ppm and replacing it with safe gases as oxygen and nitrogen within 5 years. As the plant converts carbon dioxide to oxygen, humans can convert their own toxic gases into more copious oxygen than needed. Project Oxygen does not reduce or store Carbon Dioxide; it destroys it in the conversion process. Humans will be able to continue on the exponential track of higher carbon dioxide levels each year as the project has a thermostat to keep the correct and safe levels.

    Project Oxygen is an elaborate and complex high maintenance system that will undoubtedly be the most intense and costly endeavor of humankind.

    The proven fact which is the basis for Project Oxygen is in Earth’s history. Vast areas with specific conditions allowed plants to actually pollute themselves with excessive oxygen, even so much that humans could not safely live. It can best be described as humans are destroying themselves by their own waste, in the same way the plants nearly did with their own waste which is Oxygen. There is a thermostat humans can create to keep a safe balance for both. Oxygen levels before the times of Dinosaurs would be lethal to humans. This begs the question as to how these levels were reached. There were complex situations that do not exist today 500 million years later which reveal how we could duplicate this conversion process and tailoring it to our needs. If we do not return to this process of producing copious plumes of Oxygen that has to be from the conversion of Carbon Dioxide all humans will go extinct eventually. By mathematical trend humans will go through traumatic changes within 35 years and extinction within 90. This is based on the upward trend of every aspect contributing to global warming to include population growth rate and related carbon dioxide increases. Both Population growth rate and green house gases are increasing at an alarming exponential rate. The terms of human extinction are not steady; each day there is percentage increase over growth rate. There is a high chance of reaching a tipping point due to unusual and catastrophic events. If a tipping point occurs the extinction of humankind would be swift due to current dangerous levels in the air, solids and the oceans. This implies the urgency of a need to safe guard our Beautiful Home now. Project Oxygen is both a Safeguard and a world stabilizer. Even a super volcanic eruption now could destroy all life. If Project Oxygen were in place worldwide, humans would survive this event as it has the capacity to sweep the air every day.

    Project Oxygen duplicates the era when plants produced huge release plumes of Oxygen. The prime factor is that the system releases a fast dense heavy plume rather than the current steady slow flow from plants which is also decreasing daily.

    The requirements are huge for land use but can be broken down into 600 distantly separated blocks each being 2500 square miles or 50 mile by 50 mile lots. These lots have to be placed in strategic places around the globe. The ideal locations are downwind from high output sources of carbon dioxide for example approximately 30 miles NE of Los Angeles.

    System design is no secret. What is required are the fast growing high Oxygen output plants to begin with. A permeable canopy in the center 5 miles is required. This system has a process in its design to allow heavy thick copious release pulses up to three times daily with a super plume at dusk. There are also other designs to minimize carbon dioxide at night to near plant dormancy state. Special night lighting is also required but only a small fraction of what we use on street lighting in our cities.
    The perimeter needs a windbreak such as a mountain range. The interior needs a spiral to center windbreak to allow oxygen buildup channeled to the release point. The method must allow the duplication of the early Earth where oxygen was allowed to get to toxic levels then be released. This also allows the complete consumption of carbon dioxide which; here is the key factor that is missing in our era but was the predominate process hundreds of millions years past. Today’s gradual slow release is misunderstood by even the most educated in that they have not understood the need for high sudden volume conversion. To put it very simply, adding a cup of water to a hot tub is a psychological issue, but adding the 5 gallons it needs all at once both fills it, but keeps it full longer by cooling it down as well.
    The details of construction are surely available, but the true scientist and qualified personnel in this field need to make the conclusion which if they understand the workings of this beautiful home we live in, they will.

  5. Sulfate and Sulfites are poison. Mr. Gates has enough money to pay off any politician or government, so I guess whatever he says the masses will believe him, because he has the money. Money is the only thing that carries any weight in this country. We’ll destroy ourselves, no one else has to worry about that. The only way to stop the madness is to realize that a lot of people with money may not be all they’re cracked up to be. Yes, some do wonderful things, and then perhaps on bad advice, fall prey to someone’s crazy idea and promote it. Just because someone can pay for things doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do for the whole. And no I do not believe the ends justify the means.

  6. I see he is not dumping that shit in Washington where his family lives!! This is like Epic Fail on Science Fiction proportions!

  7. yeah…geo-engineering to save billions form dying. You people are idiots if you don’t think it should at least be tried. Maybe the unrealistic greens can join the realistic greens adn support an emergency conversion to wind, solar AND nuclear immediately…retiring coal plants.

    If all you can offer is criticism of this while you have appliances running all the time or are driving a car, maybe you belong in the hell about to come.

    • You’re really not that smart, are you?

    • .. This coldest winter on record? Yea.. Global warming.. This GW push is nothing more than a money scam.. GW scientist advocate have already been caught altering the data to suit this agenda. Mind you we are having an impact on the planet.. Just not what they’re selling..

    • Petert….I am amazed at your logic. If we have a fear of poison in the distant future, why not poison ourselves immediately? You are the quintessential definition of an egg head; an educated moron!

    • Are you serious? So YOU live in a shack in the woods with no electric and hunt for your food? Oh, I guess not since you are on the Internet leaving your absurd comment. How about we help solve this problem by having mandatory rotating lights out or something and NOT kill off all the wild life and poison our water system…. If this works then excellent, if it doesn’t it could kill us all. What is wrong with you?

    • And hey if it results in increased cancer rates, respitory issues and irreparably harms the ecosystem, at least we tried….right? You’re an idiot

    • billions from dying?
      I don’t know, but I don’t think that is a fair claim.

      I think we should be respectful and cautious with our planet, I don’t know if Bill Gates is the man I would want to leave these decisions to. it’s great if he shows effort to resolve some of the many environmental issues.. but it should still be in the hands of the many to choose what happens in their skies or on their lands, not an organisation or government.

      it’s a tough one for me.. we have to start doing something about our ways as a species but I can’t figure out how to get people to behave in such ways that we don’t put our individual needs before all else.
      maybe our greed makes it inevitable that we ruin it for ourselves.

    • try thinking it through instead of having to believe what you’re told you fucking idot

    • Nuclear? Really? Fukushima is still the greatest threat going and still has the potential to wipe out all life in the northern hemisphere. It is more dangerous now than when the plants melted down. It still pumps hundreds of thousands of gallons of radioactive water into the ocean as well. Radiation is showing up in the west coast and one fish catch showed every fish contaminated. That is just one nuclear site there are a lot more available to help kill life on this earth.

      In the meantime, let’s dump heavy medals into the atmosphere changing the ph of the soils that grow our food. As famine begins and health deteriorates we can say, “at least we tried.”

      By the way, I have solar on my house and love it. Had a $25 power bill this month. Awesome. I’m still against Geo-engineering with unproved technologies aimed at unproved science. And our shutting down coal plants here does absolutely nothing when India and China put one online every five days. Of course, Obama said that our power bills will “necessarily skyrocket” so we do have that to look forward to.

    • I recall reading about all this in middle school in the 90’s and always reading or hearing about it since then. I have no idea why older folks or even people at my age (30’s) are complaining about this.

      It’s been out in the open, now you’re all afraid of chemtrails because it’s harmful? What about the plastics in your house, or fire retardants in your bed and couches? There is much worse out there than to worry about chemtrails.

      Blocking the sun from humans??? You’ve got to be frickin’ kidding me! Most people work indoors now, drive cars, stay indoors, shop indoors… G T F O! lulz!

  8. That is seriously fucked up!

  9. Wait till Earth strikes back! Retarrds! You will be sent to the sun WAISICHUS! I see your evil plans will be destroyed!

    Defenders of our world will rise. History is ours! Grafting the skies developing the land our world will always be here!

  10. Nuclear is bad idea fukashima is your evidence

  11. If you are interested in more detail and serious discussion about Persistant Contrails (Chem trails ), watch the dvd’s “What in the world are they spraying” and “Why in the world are they spraying” produced by Michael Murphy. Compelling eveidence that there is much more going on than Bill Gates interests, showing that the government and industry are co-contrubutors to the manipulation of weather and other factors affected by chemical spraying in the stratosphere

  12. Re-watch “Pirates of Silicon Valley” and pay attention.

  13. By the time they figure out global warming is a farce, they will instead have caused an ice age which will ruin the grain belt in the northern plains, the bread basket of US/Canada.

  14. So what about those people who, upon inhalation of crushed sulfer and sulfate particals, have their airways constrict? Putting this into the air could very easily be a death sentance to a lot of people.

  15. Look at the sky, people, they are already doing this. Search geoengineering watch.

  16. Re: petert
    how’s reforesting the earth for a plan, how about fixing our soils. tried and true solutions that have stood the time of millennium. how’s not buying frivolous amounts of shit (plastic toys from China, big macs, chemically laden fertilizers, and on and on) from this economy that is considered “healthy” only when that model is followed. more chemicals are not the answer. bio-engineering has not helped feed the world, nor will geo-engineering solve the global climate change problem. Lets try to come up with “realistic greens” as you say, not pump the earth with yet more chemicals, they haven’t proven themselves EVER. little reading list might inform you: Vandana Shiva, David R. Montgomery, Bill Mollison, Goeff Lawton, Scott Ogden. read up, might come in handy when you find yourself “in the hell to come.”

  17. This article is extremely one sided and it shows nothing but shitty, low-low-quality journalism. I think it’s a bad idea to dump these chemicals into the atmosphere but the writer should have put quotes from Bill Gates in the article so that we could hear his side of the story in his own words. This article is worthless in my opinion.

  18. They really haven’t proven for sure that the “global warming” is here and if it is how much damage it really does. Does it do more than the chemicals.? This is madness. Do people with all the money determine who gets to be a guinne pig for them?

    • What kind of proof do you need Linda?
      with 99% of all scientists agreeing on the fact of global warming, countless reports showing clear signs and statistics backing up theory. Or is it just that you haven´t read any weather reports the last ten years, with annual “driest/hottest/coldest/wettest/most stormy” years since measurements begun.
      It´s not like everywhere will be warmer at the same time. But the climate will change. That´s why it is called climate change.

      That said, this article doesn´t really try to explain anything anyway. There are several theories and plans being drawn out, and probably also soon to be tested in small scale, on how to stop the climate change, without re-engineering our energy hungry society. Yes, it would probably be healthier to stop burning fossil fuels than releasing extra chemicals into the atmosphere. But it doesn´t seem like anyone are putting the breaks on coal/oil/gas/tarsand so trying out second or third-fourth best options might be the way to stop millions from dying of drought/storms/fires/floods/cold and probably eventually also starvation, the way statistics and science seems to say things are heading right now.

      • 99% of ALL scientists!?!?! Did you know most of the original signers have changed their minds? Really, 99%! Hahahahahhaa. Throughout the ’70s we were told of the coming Ice Age by 2000 and all petroleum reserves would be exhausted by the same time. Stop listening to political scientists who only use the data that supports their theory and immediately ignore any data that contradicts it. This “new” scientific method is politically charged and lining the pockets of the few from the pockets of the many. You have a right to use your brain, recommend you exercise that right every now and then.

      • Linda……need proof from those who will debate not just take data from those that only agree with them. I feel confident your 99% was only asked of those they knew would agree. I agree we need to take care of our planet but this climate change is for 1984 desires only.

      • that would be “99% of all conforming scientists”, They only conform to get government grants to continue their “junk: science.

      • Really Marlon, you need to get out more and read something not written by an enviro nut-job. There has been no global warming for 15 years. This is not a pause. This is all a cycle, mother natures cycle, and it will all work out well. You cannot change the outcome. You can help some people make money along the way, by manipulating carbon credits, and getting Obama grant money for “global warming” uh I mean Climate change research,,, as long as you stick with the storyline.

        I can assure you that 99% of climate scientists do not support the theory of man made global warming as fact.

        Clearly, putting sulfates into the atmosphere is a ridiculous notion. It is also ridiculous to show pictures of commercial jet contrails as evidence of chemical pollution.

        And by the way, when the Ice melts, the water takes up less volume than the ice did, allowing sea levels to fall, unless compensated by the runoff of land ice / glaciers. I like to think of it as a balanced system that you and I simply cannot change. We can make things a little better or worse in limited areas but we simply do not matter.

  19. Global warming can be avoided at a profit. Reducing carbon emissions improves the bottom line if done intelligently. All this drama is based on the canard that it’s got to involve economic suffering for anyone but the oil and coal companies. Check out RMI.org for more details, they’ve got real-world examples and numbers. They speak joules and they speak dollars.

  20. this is already happening all over the world !! search google chem spraying
    Uk. Europe and US.
    Look up people open your eyes.

  21. Based on his track record of commercial and philanthropic success, as well as the access to legitimate climate scientists Bill Gates has, I’d say he’s infitinitely better informed on this topic that the alarmist authors of this article. Your premise is fundamentally that because this is something you don’t understand that it must be bad. That doesn’t mean the people doing it don’t understand what they’re doing, merely that you’re an idiot.

  22. If true, Bill Gates and many others need to be dispatched…

  23. The evidence is all over the east coast right now in the form of snow! It’s part plastics, organic and technology. Don’t eat it!! Yes, they are trying to make us sick because then “they” the SSG will have an antidote to sell us, so they can get richer. I pray for these people as you should too as LOVE will defeat them, AND of course writing letters about this to send to Washington, your local government and all TV stations and newspapers. Yes, our media is all controlled, but it will get out! Start talking about this among your family members and your friends. I’m in NM – before each storm that has hit the east coast this year so far and at the end of last year they spray all day long here crossing back and forth making a grid pattern and then the upper winds pick it up and sends it to the east coast. Wake UP and take your lives back!!

  24. The chem-trail theorists are perpetuating this baseless propaganda at the disgust of anybody with a functioning frontal lobe by renaming contrails (water vapor that condenses on aircraft exhaust in proper atmospheric conditions) “chem-trails”. Ones who entertain this notion should call the wintertime condensation of their breath “chem-breath”. Aircraft contrails are a prevalent feature of the sky-scape. To make a leap back to the mental stone age by making claims that they are put there by some other entity than an airline doing its boring daily business of going from point A to point B with nothing more than kindergarten level speculation to support it is hilarious. Andy Kaufman would worship the ones making this stuff up. Taking advantage of the dumbed down masses that glean knowledge from thin air is a dangerous pastime.

  25. Who gave the ever increasingly pychotic Bill Gates the right to screw with our air and Earth ? He’s not a scientist , not even good at what he does do… Steal others ideas. How did he become an Elitist? Who gave him any say so in our planets welfare?this is like a bad dream … The government knows about this crap?and the people have been informed? I hope some one blows that thing out of the sky before the toxic chemicals are.released… It’s bad enough he bought 5 million shares of Monsanto ( surpassed only be George Soros at 9 mlion shares) and thinks he a world leader but to screw with OUR air , food and water supply?

  26. No shit he’s a vaccine enthusiast, he wants to help to keep children from dying from preventable diseases. What a monster.

  27. If we really wanted a solution we should have talked to Steve Jobs before he died….

  28. I’m a strong supporter of the chemtrails program but primarily because I have heard of no realistic alternative. in a way i think the public support for this is shallow and based too on there being no alternatives offered. I know people who are involved in spraying the poison and to a person they are fine individuals who do their work even though they know they are poisoning their own children. I hope those who are, for their own reasons, opposed to this program don’t blame the individual public servants carrying it out.

  29. Neither Global Warming, nor Chemtrail Sulphate Particles are a problem for the planet…

    They may be a problem to humanity, but Mother Earth will soon get sick of it and just shake off the fleas and start over.

    Perhaps the could start by spraying over Gates home since he is into and all.

    I’m going with Apple.

    Peace

  30. “The stated purpose for this massive release of toxic sulfate particles is that doing so will allegedly reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere”
    Really? It seams their proofreading is as good as their science.

    The atmosphere has a mass of about 5.15×10 18 kg, That’s 515,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms. They would have to suspend 515,000,000,000 kilograms or 1,133,000,000,000 pounds (1.1 Trillion pounds) of any chemical in the air at once to raise the level to one part per billion…..Until it rains somewhere (which it usually is) then there goes the concentration.

    For comparison, the level of CO2 in the atmosphere is 397 parts per MILLION, methane is 1.79 parts per MILLION.

    If it cost only $1 per pound to buy the chemical and get it into the air, Bill doesn’t have enough money. Does anyone know where to get 1.1 trillion pounds of suflates?

  31. Stop the global warming/guilty humans thing, Too many of you are all being led over a cliff by abusive willful deception and political manipulations by organizations that wear a US badge and should be investigated for doing so. Abuse of facts that should never be close and incorporated into collaborating in changing laws and behaviors in fraudulent claims. Here is what you should be informed of by honest non exploiting resources…………
    This planet does cycle through a phenomenon called Ice Ages. An Ice age by geological confirmation is an approximate reoccurring two million year long event punctuated by cycles within of completing periods somewhere near 100 K years of which there are seventy K years of cooler earth temps, (est. to be some 10 to 20 degrees lower ave’s), and approximately 30 K years of warming (warmer cycle, of which we are @ midway in a warm period now)
    This cooling portion of an Ice
    Age Cycle is accompanied by the phenomenons of massive, (and I do mean massive) condensation of water vapor at the poles. Just as the freezer coils in your freezer will freeze water vapor from the air into a massive ice cap on your very own freezer coils, so does the earth manage to pile Ice Multiple miles thick in the far northern regions where it flows to the border of the US reaching that 49th parallel in as much as two thousand foot thick glaciers.
    Ill ask you now to take a moment and imagine yourself standing before a wall of Ice two thousand feet high bottoming out near your feet. Do the imagination thing and share your imagine moment in a response!
    If I am not mistaken the northern pole of earth builds a greater amount of condensate than the southern pole (separate discussions). These simply explained ice formation phenomenons are a worthy read and interesting subject wether in your freezer or in the form of massive ice coverings that periodically visit our world. Read up and review water solidification and please do a fact check on that for yourself)
    Any way, all this to say yes to global warming, Yes it exists, and that it has nothing to do with mankind as it occurs with or without human presence and is not confirmed in any way to be a result of human behavior when overlain the facts of earths verified Icing/warming phenomenon before mankind grew up making coffee and riding fast airplanes. If you would like to play “pay guilt taxes” to your not completely honest government, be my guest. There are such deep roots in this scam that I get nervous telling the truth about this global scam. Ill be alright, 90% of our worlds population has my back. Its your future you need to manage, not the governments.
    All this to say, its possible not global warming that the perfect society is experimenting to manage, even with our nations permission to practice dissemination of unknown products into our breathing air. How about a little triple verification of these endeavors to maintain their interests to the American republic and its people/citizens rate something that Americans have full disclosure about. After all, many people were told they were getting wonderful showers when brought to their extinction. How are the American people so informed as to be able to verify intentions, activities and verified intended outcomes?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>